Published April 2026

Philips CPAP Alternative Devices: A Guide for Recalled Users

Medically reviewed by licensed healthcare professionals · Legally reviewed by mass tort litigation specialists · Last updated: April 2026

One of the most immediate challenges for sleep apnea patients after the Philips recall was finding a safe, effective alternative CPAP device in a market suddenly strained by massive demand. If you're still looking for a replacement or considering your options, this guide provides an overview of the major non-Philips CPAP manufacturers and what to consider.

Top Alternative CPAP Brands

ResMed

ResMed is the other dominant player in the CPAP market alongside Philips, and their devices are the most common alternative for recalled users. ResMed's AirSense and AirCurve lines are direct competitors to Philips's DreamStation series.

• AirSense Series (10 and 11): These are ResMed's flagship auto-adjusting CPAP (APAP) machines. They are known for their quiet operation, user-friendly interface, and robust data tracking through the myAir app. The AirSense 11 is the newer model with a more modern touchscreen interface.
• AirCurve Series: These are ResMed's bilevel (BiPAP) devices, designed for patients who need higher pressure support or have more complex sleep apnea.
• Sound Abatement: ResMed devices use silicone and other stable polymer materials for sound abatement, not PE-PUR foam.

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare

Fisher & Paykel is a New Zealand-based company known for its focus on humidification technology and patient comfort. Their SleepStyle series is a popular alternative.

• F&P SleepStyle: This is an integrated APAP machine with a built-in humidifier and a simple, compact design. It's often praised for its excellent humidification performance, preventing the dry mouth and nasal passages some CPAP users experience.
• F&P InfoSmart: This is their data management system, providing therapy reports for patients and clinicians.

3B Medical

3B Medical is a smaller U.S.-based manufacturer that has gained market share following the Philips recall. Their Luna line is a cost-effective alternative.

• Luna II APAP: A reliable and more budget-friendly option compared to the top-tier ResMed models. It offers auto-adjusting pressure, an integrated humidifier, and Wi-Fi data reporting.

What to Consider When Choosing a Replacement

Consult with your sleep specialist before making any changes to your therapy. Your doctor can recommend a device and pressure settings appropriate for your specific needs.

Key factors to discuss:

• Device Type: Do you need a standard CPAP, an auto-adjusting APAP, or a bilevel BiPAP? Your prescription will specify this.
• Humidification: Do you live in a dry climate or experience nasal dryness? A device with an integrated, high-performance humidifier might be a priority.
• Data Tracking: Do you want to monitor your therapy data (like AHI, leak rate, and usage hours) on a smartphone app? ResMed's myAir platform is considered the market leader in this area.
• Mask Compatibility: Most CPAP masks are compatible with most machines, as they use a standard tubing diameter. However, it's always good to confirm that your preferred mask will work seamlessly with your new device.
• Insurance Coverage: Check with your insurance provider about their coverage for replacement CPAP devices. The Philips recall has prompted many insurers to update their replacement policies.

The SoClean Controversy

Philips initially suggested that ozone-based cleaners like SoClean may have contributed to the foam degradation problem. While this has been a point of legal contention, many sleep specialists now recommend avoiding ozone cleaners altogether. The safest way to clean your CPAP mask, tubing, and water chamber is with mild soap and warm water, according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Does Getting a Replacement Affect Your Legal Claim?

No. Accepting a replacement device from Philips or purchasing an alternative from another manufacturer does not waive your right to file a personal injury or medical monitoring claim. Your legal claim is based on the harm you may have suffered from using the recalled device, not on whether you eventually received a replacement.